UFC 329: McGregor vs. Holloway 2

Zachary Reese by Decision in round 3

Confidence: low · Scoring v1

Zachary Reese is the pick by decision in round 3. The deterministic engine favors Zachary Reese based on Zachary Reese shows a 5.5 finishing threat and 6.5 durability score. Zachary Reese carries a 6.7 physical profile and 4.4 certainty score. Confidence is low because the overall scoring gap is 0.1.

• Zachary Reese shows a 5.5 finishing threat and 6.5 durability score.
• Zachary Reese carries a 6.7 physical profile and 4.4 certainty score.
• Zachary Reese has a unclear trend with 0-0 results across the last 0 fights.
• Zachary Reese grades 5.4 in striking pace and effectiveness.

Wang Cong by Decision in round 3

Confidence: moderate · Scoring v1

Wang Cong is the pick by decision in round 3. The deterministic engine favors Wang Cong based on Wang Cong has a improving trend with 4-1 results across the last 5 fights. Wang Cong carries a 5.9 physical profile and 7.7 certainty score. Confidence is moderate because the overall scoring gap is 0.6.

• Wang Cong has a improving trend with 4-1 results across the last 5 fights.
• Wang Cong carries a 5.9 physical profile and 7.7 certainty score.
• Wang Cong shows a 5.5 finishing threat and 6.1 durability score.
• Wang Cong grades 5.4 in striking pace and effectiveness.

Ode' Osbourne by Decision in round 3

Confidence: moderate · Scoring v1

Ode' Osbourne is the pick by decision in round 3. The deterministic engine favors Ode' Osbourne based on Ode' Osbourne carries a 6.7 physical profile and 7.7 certainty score. Ode' Osbourne shows a 5.5 finishing threat and 6.1 durability score. Confidence is moderate because the overall scoring gap is 0.2.

• Ode' Osbourne carries a 6.7 physical profile and 7.7 certainty score.
• Ode' Osbourne shows a 5.5 finishing threat and 6.1 durability score.
• Ode' Osbourne grades 5.4 in striking pace and effectiveness.
• Ode' Osbourne grades 4.9 in grappling/wrestling, driven by takedown and submission metrics.

Cody Garbrandt by Decision in round 3

Confidence: moderate · Scoring v1

Cody Garbrandt is the pick by decision in round 3. The deterministic engine favors Cody Garbrandt based on Cody Garbrandt carries a 5.8 physical profile and 7.7 certainty score. Cody Garbrandt shows a 5.5 finishing threat and 6.1 durability score. Confidence is moderate because the overall scoring gap is 0.2.

• Cody Garbrandt carries a 5.8 physical profile and 7.7 certainty score.
• Cody Garbrandt shows a 5.5 finishing threat and 6.1 durability score.
• Cody Garbrandt grades 5.4 in striking pace and effectiveness.
• Cody Garbrandt has a declining trend with 3-2 results across the last 5 fights.

Damian Pinas by Decision in round 3

Confidence: low · Scoring v1

Damian Pinas is the pick by decision in round 3. The deterministic engine favors Damian Pinas based on Damian Pinas has a unclear trend with 2-0 results across the last 2 fights. Damian Pinas shows a 6.5 finishing threat and 6.5 durability score. Confidence is low because the overall scoring gap is 0.5.

• Damian Pinas has a unclear trend with 2-0 results across the last 2 fights.
• Damian Pinas shows a 6.5 finishing threat and 6.5 durability score.
• Damian Pinas carries a 6.3 physical profile and 5.2 certainty score.
• Damian Pinas grades 5.4 in striking pace and effectiveness.

Luke Riley by Decision in round 3

Confidence: low · Scoring v1

Luke Riley is the pick by decision in round 3. The deterministic engine favors Luke Riley based on Luke Riley has a unclear trend with 2-0 results across the last 2 fights. Luke Riley shows a 5.5 finishing threat and 6.5 durability score. Confidence is low because the overall scoring gap is 0.4.

• Luke Riley has a unclear trend with 2-0 results across the last 2 fights.
• Luke Riley shows a 5.5 finishing threat and 6.5 durability score.
• Luke Riley carries a 6.3 physical profile and 5.2 certainty score.
• Luke Riley grades 5.4 in striking pace and effectiveness.

Nikita Krylov by Decision in round 3

Confidence: moderate · Scoring v1

Nikita Krylov is the pick by decision in round 3. The deterministic engine favors Nikita Krylov based on Nikita Krylov carries a 6.8 physical profile and 7.7 certainty score. Nikita Krylov shows a 6.5 finishing threat and 4.9 durability score. Confidence is moderate because the overall scoring gap is 0.5.

• Nikita Krylov carries a 6.8 physical profile and 7.7 certainty score.
• Nikita Krylov shows a 6.5 finishing threat and 4.9 durability score.
• Nikita Krylov grades 5.4 in striking pace and effectiveness.
• Nikita Krylov grades 5.3 in grappling/wrestling, driven by takedown and submission metrics.

Gable Steveson by Decision in round 3

Confidence: moderate · Scoring v1

Gable Steveson is the pick by decision in round 3. The deterministic engine favors Gable Steveson based on Gable Steveson shows a 5.5 finishing threat and 6.5 durability score. Gable Steveson has a unclear trend with 0-0 results across the last 0 fights. Confidence is moderate because the overall scoring gap is 0.6.

• Gable Steveson shows a 5.5 finishing threat and 6.5 durability score.
• Gable Steveson has a unclear trend with 0-0 results across the last 0 fights.
• Gable Steveson grades 5.4 in striking pace and effectiveness.
• Gable Steveson grades 4.9 in grappling/wrestling, driven by takedown and submission metrics.

Lone'er Kavanagh by Decision in round 3

Confidence: moderate · Scoring v1

Lone'er Kavanagh is the pick by decision in round 3. The deterministic engine favors Lone'er Kavanagh based on Lone'er Kavanagh carries a 6 physical profile and 7.7 certainty score. Lone'er Kavanagh has a declining trend with 4-1 results across the last 5 fights. Confidence is moderate because the overall scoring gap is 0.5.

• Lone'er Kavanagh carries a 6 physical profile and 7.7 certainty score.
• Lone'er Kavanagh has a declining trend with 4-1 results across the last 5 fights.
• Lone'er Kavanagh shows a 5.5 finishing threat and 6.1 durability score.
• Lone'er Kavanagh grades 5.4 in striking pace and effectiveness.

Mario Bautista by Decision in round 3

Confidence: moderate · Scoring v1

Mario Bautista is the pick by decision in round 3. The deterministic engine favors Mario Bautista based on Mario Bautista carries a 6.4 physical profile and 7.7 certainty score. Mario Bautista has a declining trend with 4-1 results across the last 5 fights. Confidence is moderate because the overall scoring gap is 0.2.

• Mario Bautista carries a 6.4 physical profile and 7.7 certainty score.
• Mario Bautista has a declining trend with 4-1 results across the last 5 fights.
• Mario Bautista shows a 5.9 finishing threat and 6.9 durability score.
• Mario Bautista grades 5.5 in grappling/wrestling, driven by takedown and submission metrics.

Benoît Saint Denis by Decision in round 3

Confidence: moderate · Scoring v1

Benoît Saint Denis is the pick by decision in round 3. The deterministic engine favors Benoît Saint Denis based on Benoît Saint Denis has a improving trend with 4-1 results across the last 5 fights. Benoît Saint Denis carries a 6.6 physical profile and 7.7 certainty score. Confidence is moderate because the overall scoring gap is 0.4.

• Benoît Saint Denis has a improving trend with 4-1 results across the last 5 fights.
• Benoît Saint Denis carries a 6.6 physical profile and 7.7 certainty score.
• Benoît Saint Denis shows a 6.5 finishing threat and 5.7 durability score.
• Benoît Saint Denis grades 5.4 in grappling/wrestling, driven by takedown and submission metrics.

Max Holloway by Decision in round 5

Confidence: moderate · Scoring v1

Max Holloway is the pick by decision in round 5. The deterministic engine favors Max Holloway based on Max Holloway carries a 5.9 physical profile and 7.7 certainty score. Max Holloway shows a 6.1 finishing threat and 5.7 durability score. Confidence is moderate because the overall scoring gap is 0.7.

• Max Holloway carries a 5.9 physical profile and 7.7 certainty score.
• Max Holloway shows a 6.1 finishing threat and 5.7 durability score.
• Max Holloway has a declining trend with 3-2 results across the last 5 fights.
• Max Holloway grades 5.4 in striking pace and effectiveness.